Pages

Sunday, November 28, 2010

Advent


According to present [1907] usage, Advent is a period beginning with the Sunday nearest to the feast of St. Andrew the Apostle (November 30) and following four Sundays. The first Sunday may be as early as November 27, and then Advent has twenty-eight days, or as late as December 3, giving the season only twenty-one days.

With Advent the ecclesiastical year begins in the Western churches. During this time the faithful are admonished 1) to prepare themselves worthily to celebrate the anniversary of the Lord's coming into the world as the incarnate God of love and mercy, 2) thus to make their souls fitting dwellings for the Redeemer coming in Holy Communion and through grace, and 3) thereby to make themselves ready for His final coming as judge, at death and at the end of the world.

Here some links to some good Advent stuff:

Catholic Education Resource Center Advent Catholic Traditions for Avent & Christmas
USCCB Advent Resources
The Our Sunday Visitor’s “Definitive Guide to Advent”
DomesticChurch.com “Fridge Art” Advent activities (good for kids)
Catholic.org Advent Resources
EWTN Advent Resources
Catholic Fire’s 12 Tips to a Holier Advent

Thursday, November 11, 2010

Prayer and the Saints

One of the chief objections raised by non-Catholics is why do Catholics pray to Mary and the saints when Sacred Scripture states that there is only one mediator between God and man?

There is a very simple response to this once we agree on a few basics. First of all, Catholics do recognize and have always recognized that Christ is the one mediator between God and man. Second, prayer to the saints does not bypass Christ but is actually a request to the saints to intercede for us before the throne of Christ in Heaven.

It is very much like you asking a friend of yours to pray for you. If you truly believe that there is only one mediator between God and man then why would you ask someone else to pray for you?!

It appears that this issue is now reduced to the question of can the saints hear our requests and can they pray for us? Scripture teaches us that the angels and saints place the prayers of the holy on earth before the throne of God (Tobit 12:12, Revelation 5:8 and Revelation 8:3-4). So if we believe scripture, we can agree that the saints are interceding for us before God. So Catholics are simply asking Mary and the saints, as well as their friends on earth, to pray for them.

One last question to consider in this regard is this; are the prayers of sinners on earth more or less effective than the prayers of the saints in Heaven who are already in the presence of the Beatific Vision? Who would you rather have praying for you?

Purgatory

When we do something wrong to another, there are generally two issues to be addressed. One is seeking the forgiveness of the person who was hurt and the other is performing restitution. For example, if you were to break a neighbor’s window, the chances are that they would forgive you. You would however, still owe them for the replacement of the window.

This is like the Catholic understanding of our relationship with God. The Catholic Encyclopedia defines Purgatory as "the condition or state for those who have not totally alienated themselves from God by their sins, but who are temporarily and partially alienated from God while their love is made perfect and they give satisfaction for their sins".


So if we die while still owing restitution to God, we Catholics believe that our souls must pass through a cleansing state before entering Heaven. Scriptures refers to this in Revelation 21:27 where it states that nothing unclean shall enter Heaven. Also in 1 Corinthians 3:15, St. Paul tells us that each man's works will be tried after his death. If his works fail, he will be the loser and yet he himself will be saved, though only as men are saved by passing through fire. This penalty can not refer to Hell since no one is saved from Hell. It can't refer to Heaven since there is no pain in Heaven. Therefore, there must be some other state or process after our death.

The Catholics have another scripture reference in 2 Maccabees 12:39-45, one of the books that Luther removed from the Bible. This book has a direct reference to praying for the dead. Why should one pray for the dead if they are in Heaven? Or why pray for the dead in Hell since it can't help them?

Who decides which position is correct? Who decides if Maccabees is or is not an inspired book of the Bible? For Catholics it's simple. The Church, using her teaching authority from Christ, is the only one authorized to make such a decision.

The Eucharist

As with previous posts, we can first look to the Old Testament for a prefiguring of the Eucharist.

Let's begin with the very first Passover meal. This meal was the key to the deliverance of the chosen people from their bondage. As the story goes, an un-blemished male lamb was chosen to be slaughtered for the Passover meal. The blood of the lamb was applied to the doorpost. All who participated in the Passover meal were required to eat the flesh of the lamb. Only this way would the firstborn of the family be spared from the angel of death.

Now we come to the New Testament. The key reference we want to start with begins at John 6:48. Before He is done at verse 71, Christ mentions not once but four times that we must eat His flesh and drink His blood in order to obtain eternal life. Many disciples decide to leave Christ at this point because they could not accept His teaching. Does our Lord call them all back and say to them that He really didn't mean what He said? No! He lets them go their way.

Jesus then goes on to challenge the Apostles. Simon Peter is the only one to speak saying "Master, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life. We have come to believe and are convinced that you are the Holy One of God." Did the Apostles understand the discourse that Jesus just finished giving? Probably not; but they accepted the teaching and believed in Him. 

The fulfillment of Christ's command in John 6 to eat His body and drink His blood comes at the last supper (Passover) when He institutes the Eucharist with the words "this IS my body ..." and "this IS my blood ...". Here is where the first imperfect Passover from the Old Testament is perfectly fulfilled in the New Testament. The spotless male lamb is to be offered as a sacrifice to obtain our redemption from the bondage of sin. The flesh and blood of the lamb is consumed. 

The words of our Lord are clear and the parallels with the Old Testament are undeniable. The Eucharist is truly the body and blood of our Lord Jesus Christ. Don't make the mistake of walking away from this teaching as many did in John's Gospel.

The Papacy

It might help to understand the Papacy and the role of the Pope, by first looking back to the Old Testament and our salvation history.

All throughout salvation history, God has raised up leaders for His chosen people, i.e. Moses, David and Abraham. These leaders spoke on behalf of God with His full authority to speak. They taught and directed the chosen people in the practice of their beliefs, in determining right from wrong and in making moral decisions.

Peter was singled out in the scriptures as the first in authority among the apostles. Peter is generally mentioned first when Christ speaks of the apostles (Matthew 10:1-4, Mark 3:16-19, Luke 6:14-16, and Acts 1:13). Peter also speaks on behalf of the apostles in several instances (Matthew 18:21, Mark 8:29, Luke 12:41 and John 6:69). Peter is also the first to speak at Pentecost!

When our Lord first chose Peter, his name was Simon. Our Lord changed it to Peter which in and of itself is no small statement by our Lord. For the Jews of that time, a change in name was very significant. Consider those who had their names changed by God the Father, i.e. Abram to Abraham.

When Peter made his profession of faith in Matthew 16:16, that Jesus was the Son of the living God, Jesus responded in a unique way. He declared to Peter that he was rock and on this rock He would build HIS church. That the gates of hell would not prevail against it. He would give Peter the keys of the kingdom and what he bound on earth would be bound in heaven and what he loosed on earth would be loosed in heaven. After the resurrection, Peter was asked by our Lord three times to confirm his love and then he was instructed three times to feed His sheep. There can be no doubt about this responsibility or this authority since it was given directly by Christ to Peter.

Why would Christ give such responsibility and authority to a man who would follow him to the Father relatively soon? What is it that Peter could do in his short lifetime that Christ had not already accomplished? If we take Christ's promises to Peter seriously and if we trust in the Old Testament as a prefiguring of the events of the New Testament, it is not to hard to conclude that the authority given to Peter was indeed to be passed on to his successors in order to have an authoritative teacher as Christ's representative here on earth.

Are We Assured of Salvation?

Let's start our review of this topic by defining what is meant by redemption and salvation.

Christ redeemed us all through His incarnation, life, passion, death and resurrection in complete obedience to the will of His Father. Because of His redemptive action, heaven is now open to ALL of mankind. Salvation on the other hand, deals with each of us individually and our relationship with God and how we, as an individual, actually get to heaven.

The non-Catholic view of salvation is that once one accepts Christ as their personal Lord and Savior, their salvation is assured. This comes from several scripture quotes including John 3:3, Hebrews 9:12 and Romans 5:15. The belief is generally that no matter how good or bad we are after we've accepted Christ, we can not lose our salvation. They often require what they call the ‘Sinner’s Prayer’, which by the way is not found in the Bible.

Although none of these verses refer specifically to FAITH ALONE, Romans 3:28 is generally used to support this belief since it states that a person is justified by faith apart from the law. It is possible that one might be led to this conclusion by looking ONLY at these scriptures AND by approaching scripture with the predetermined idea that all Catholic practices and traditions are unnecessary. But as I previously discussed, the entire Bible is inspired and we can not therefore recognize ONLY those verses which meet our particular need, i.e. no cherry picking.

St. Paul, in Romans 3:28, was referring to works peculiar to the old Jewish Law, i.e. circumcision as in Romans 3:30-31. When Catholics refer to works they mean works of charity and love.

Understanding that the entire Bible is inspired, we only have to look to many other scripture verses where the doctrine of faith alone is specifically singled out as invalid. For example, you can refer to Ephesians 2:10, 1 Timothy 6:18, Titus 2:7, James 2:14-26, Revelation 2:5, 2:23, 2:26, 20:12 where works are identified as key to our salvation.

Finally, we can look to Matthew 25:32-46 where our Lord Himself specifically identifies the necessity of performing good works. Those who perform good works during their lifetime will be saved; those who don't will not. Studying these scriptures with an open heart and an open mind can only lead us to the conclusion that faith AND good works are necessary for salvation; not simply faith alone.

Friday, August 20, 2010

The Bible Alone?

Is it the Bible alone or Bible and Tradition? What is the pillar and foundation of truth? If we believe that the Bible is the infallible inspired word of God, 1 Timothy 3:15 tells us we find that the Church is the pillar and foundation of truth.

Most non-Catholic Christians believe that the Bible is the sole rule of Faith. Martin Luther claimed this when he broke away from the Catholic Church, i.e. the claim of "Sola Scriptura." Catholics have, on the other hand, always accepted the teaching authority of the Church together with the Bible as the basis for our Faith.

So then, how do Catholics come to this position?

Well we didn't actually come to this position; we have been simply living it out since the very inception of the Church. A brief historical perspective might be helpful in understanding this.

From a previous post (Is the Bible Inspired?), we saw that the New Testament books were not really put together as a completed Bible until approximately 400 AD. So we know that the earliest Christians did not have access to the written word. We also know that until the invention of the printing press in the 1450's, the Bible was not accessible to most people due to the difficult and time consuming task of making copies by hand. It wasn't even until fairly recently that faithful Christians were educated enough to be able to read the Bible.

Make you wonder how the Christian faith was passed on to believers during this period of when access to the Bible was quite limited.

The answer is that practically all of the teaching during this time was done by oral instruction relying on the teaching authority of the Church for the proper interpretation of the Scriptures and for the passing on of Apostolic Tradition.

The Bible itself is quite clear regarding the significance of tradition (see John 21:25, 2 Timothy 2:2, 2 Thessalonians 2:15 and 1 Corinthians 11:2). Since these scripture references, along with many others, refer to both tradition and the spoken word, they MUST be integrated into the Christian understanding of revelation. Since the Word of God can not contradict itself, the only choice we have as Bible believing Christians is to accept tradition as well as scripture as our source of faith.

Thursday, August 19, 2010

Is the Bible Inspired?

I know. That sounds like a crazy question, but have you ever seriously considered it. It seems to me that most Christians (Catholics and non-Catholics alike) just accept that the Bible is inspired without giving it a second thought. What is the reason for this? Perhaps it is because our parents and teachers told us it was or because when we read scripture we feel inspired by it or because scripture itself states that "all scripture is inspired by God and is useful for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, so that everyone who belongs to God may be proficient, equipped for every good work" (2 Timothy 3:16-17)?

If you really take the time to think about it, none of these reasons are good enough for us to build our system of beliefs on. Parents and teachers have no direct proof or authority to teach us that the Bible is inspired; it comes from their own traditions! The feeling of inspiration one gets from reading scripture does not guarantee that scripture is inspired. And, many other religious books claim to be inspired, e.g. as the Koran and the Book of Mormon.

So then, how do we know that the Bible is truly inspired?

First we will not assume the Bible is inspired but will look at it strictly from a historical perspective. We can easily support the historical accuracy of the New Testament from many other writings existing today. Since we know that it is historically accurate, we know that a man named Jesus actually existed and that He worked numerous miracles during His lifetime and that He claimed to be the Son of God. From this we can make two statements about Jesus. Either He was who He said He was, or He was crazy. If He was crazy, then how do we explain the many miracles, the eye witness accounts of His resurrection and the numerous people willing to die for him? We can't! Quite to the contrary, these facts actually point to the conclusion that Jesus was who He said He was; the Son of God.

Now, if He was the Son of God, we know that He would accomplish all that He said He would. One of the things He said He would do is to found His Church; "And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build MY church, and the gates of Hell will not prevail against it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven." (Matthew 16:18-19).

Well, now we have a Church founded by Jesus himself which was given the authority to bind and loose; so now let’s take a look at the Bible.

In the early years of the Church, there was no New Testament. In fact, it was not until around the year 400 AD that the final version of the books of the Bible was actually compiled. How do we know that those books of the Bible actually represent the word of God? The answer is now fairly simple! It doesn't depend on our parents or teachers and their traditions, our feelings or a statement in a scripture claiming inspiration. We know the Bible is inspired because the Church that Christ founded used the teaching authority given by Christ to discern which scriptures were inspired and which were not.

About Me



Life Curriculum

Core


Catholic

  • I love being Catholic
  • I love my mom and dad for raising me Catholic
  • I love my mom and dad for their enforcing discipline, which I believe is the primary reason I am an obedient Catholic today.
  • The Catholic Church is my mother. I do my best to be obedient to Her as a child should to his mom
  • “I can be obedient, because it is my fundamental coniction that my intelligence is limited and the Church is wiser” –Joseph Ratzinger
Husband
  • I love being a husband
  • I have a covenant relationship with my wife
  • There is no person on earth I love more than my wife
  • I love sharing my Catholic faith with my wife
  • I have a goal to help my wife get to heaven
Father
  • I love being a father
  • God made me to be a father
  • Being a father, I understand why God created man
  • I love teaching my children
  • The best thing I can do for my children is love their mother

Electives

Golf
  • I love golf
  • I love to play golf
  • I love to watch golf, especially the Masters, US Open & Ryder Cup
Reading
  • I love reading about the Church’s dogmas, traditions, history, etc.
  • I enjoy Catholic conversion stories. e.g. Surprised by Truth books
  • I enjoy Catholic apologetics. e.g. The Catholic Answer and Envoy magazines
  • I keep up with conservative news. e.g. townhall.com and cnsnews.com
Sports Teams
  • I love the St. Louis Cardinals and UNC Tarheels basketball
  • I very much enjoy watching the Cards and Heels at my dad’s…his huge HDTV is a plus also
  • I was born in St. Louis. Hence, the love of the Cards
  • I moved to North Carolina at age 8. Hence, the love of the Heels
  • 1934 my dad was born and the Cardinals won the World Series, 1964 I was born and the Cardinals won the World Series, 2006 my first son was born and the Cardinals won the World Series. And in 2011, my daughter was born and the Cardinals won the World Series. How sweet is that!
Beer
  • Many people close to me will say this belongs in my core curriculum…and the first one to say so is my loving, beautiful, patient wife
  • I love Belgium beer. Now that NC has repealed its alcohol by volume limit, I have local access to all kinds of great Belgium high gravity beers.
  • I love most microbrews, especially ESB and IPA…the bitter the better

Saturday, May 29, 2010

Burqa Barbie

In honor of her 50th birthday as one of the Western world's most popular girls' toys, Barbie was given a makeover — wearing a burqa. Outfitted in the traditional Islamic dress, the iconic doll went undercover for a charity auction in connection with Sotheby's Save The Children. More than 500 burqa-clad Barbies appeared in the show at the Salone dei Cinquecento in Florence, Italy. Toy manufacturer Mattel backed the exhibition, which was the work of Italian designer Eliana Lorena. The company director of Laird Assessors from England applauded the move: "Bring it on Burqa Barbie, I think this is a great idea…. The message with Barbie for women is you can be whatever you want to be" (Daily Mail, Feb. 16).

Animal Sacrifices to Zombies

Max Beauvoir, the head voodoo priest of Haiti, says he is sickened by the desecration of dead bodies, which were unceremoniously collected off of city streets and hurled into mass graves in the wake of the earthquake that leveled Port-au-Prince. His objections, he explained, are on religious grounds. Beauvoir told Haitian President René Préval that the desecration of bodies in this manner could lead to the dead roaming the earth again as zombies. In his voodoo temple in Port-au-Prince before the earth­quake's destruction, Beauvoir and his followers held frequent ceremonies to summon the spirits. They would light blazing bonfires and dance around a giant totem poll. The ceremonies would end with animal sacrifices and the draining of their blood (CNN.com, Jan. 17). ...

Shoot Pope, Correct Bible

The Turkish man who attempted to assassinate Pope John Paul II in 1981 has said he wants political asylum in Croatia, where he plans to write a new Bible. In a message delivered through his lawyers, Mehmet Ali Agca told the influential Vecernji List newspaper in Zagreb (Jan. 24): "Croatia is a Catholic country and I am a Catholic. I am preparing to write a new Bible and correct mistakes and I would like to do that in Catholic Croatia since Italy and Spain refused to grant me asylum." Agca was released from a Turkish prison in January after serving nearly three decades behind bars. In rambling letters from prison, he has given a number of indications suggesting he is mentally disturbed. Agca, for example, also said in a written statement that he would prove he is the Messiah "through Vatican documents."

Blessed John Paul II forgiving the man who shot him

Wednesday, May 19, 2010

Of Sheep and Men

This is the bulk of a homily by a learned and wise professor and priest.

Sheep are mentioned more than 500 times in Scripture, which is significantly more than any other animal. In both the Old Testament and the New Testament, sheep are the favorite analogy in describing people and their relationship with the Father in heaven. We are sheep. While being sheep of our Lord's flock is a blessing, it isn't much of a compliment, I am afraid!
But maybe it is; let's see and have a closer look.

There are quite some negative traits that can be pointed out about sheep:

Sheep of all domestic animals require the most care and supervision. Left to themselves, sheep have an unlimited capacity for getting into trouble.

1) Sheep are compelled by mob instinct. Sheep take their queues from each other. If one sheep panics, they all panic. They tend to go with the flow, even if the flow is going in the wrong direction. They have a tendency to wander off. Sheep are forever getting lost.

2) Sheep are very susceptible to fear. The average sheep is a coward. One loud noise of any kind - it doesn't have to be the howl of a wolf - sends the flock in every direction. When confronted with danger, sheep panic.

3) Sheep are very destructive. Sheep have the very bad habit of being very hard on the pasture. When they graze they don't trim the grass they eat. They bite down and pull up, removing the roots, and not only the stems.

4) Sheep are very vulnerable to predators. Among animals, sheep are wimps. They are weak, slow, stupid and defenseless.

5) Sheep have an incredible ability to get dirty. They easily turn every shade of gray and brown imaginable. Sheep get dirty and stay that way until somebody cleans them up.

Whether we like it or not, we are in many ways like sheep. As time passes we get dirty, until it becomes obvious that we need a good cleaning. God offers a good cleaning in the Sacrament of Confession. We require more care than any other animal and God loves to give us that care. We have a mob instinct, but when that is channeled, it can become a great show of unity. We are subject to fear, but he gives us courage and the peace that surpasses all our understanding. We are also timid, but he makes us brave. All of us have a tendency to wander off now and then, but our shepherd always finds us. He forgives us and cleans us so that we are ever presentable to God the Father.

The most important thing is that sheep are clearly God's favorite animals. In a world filled with majestic animals like lions, horses and eagles, the Lord chose sheep. And there isn't a better metaphor in Scripture for our relationship to God. We are his sheep. God's sheep have a special role to play in God's plan:

1) Sheep have horns. The first trumpets were ram's horns. Those ram's horns or trumpets were announcing the presence of the Lord (see Joshua.) They were instruments of praise. They were part of a mighty victory. The trumpet sound was made with a ram's horn. That means that sheep can literally be instruments of praise. We, being the Lord's sheep, can announce his presence and majesty.

2) Sheep are the favorite meat in the Middle East; they also give us milk and wool. Sheepskins are used for shelter and clothing. Sheep bones can be made into sewing needles and are used as scraping tools. Intestines are made into strings for musical instruments. There is much goodness and usefulness in sheep. Nothing or almost nothing is wasted. We can be instruments of God's bounty and mercy, more effectively than any sheep that ever lived. What being God's sheep means more than anything is that we have great potential in God's plan. Once in his flock, even our weaknesses become strengths.

3) Sheep plant seeds that will ensure future pastures. In biblical times, sheep were instrumental in planting seeds. During harvest, wheat seeds were knocked from the wheat stalks onto the ground. They would lay on the surface and be eaten by the birds. This is when shepherds would bring their flocks into the fields. The pointed cloven hooves of the sheep would make holes one-half to one inch deep, and the seed would be pressed into the ground. Seed planting is one of our main responsibilities as part of God's flock. God's word must be pressed into the ground of our minds and hearts. The harvest will be the Kingdom of God.

With all this, how can we still doubt that we are God's favorite animal? And should some doubt still linger, think of this: I am one of God's sheep, and he was willing to die for me. Nothing we have ever done declares our value in God's eye more than Christ's death for us. At that historic moment, Jesus laid down his life on the cross for his sheep, and we became priceless. Even the least of Christ's sheep is of more value than anything else on earth, and the same price was paid for all of us. We may then conclude with Erasmus of Rotterdam: "O dumb sheep you! Did it ever dawn on you that it has pleased God to save the world by foolishness, since it could never be redeemed by wisdom?" 

Tuesday, May 4, 2010

Authority and Vatican II

Some in the Catholic Church love Vatican II because they think it finally brought the Catholic Church out of the dark ages. Some suspect the Second Vatican Council because they fear it sold out faithfulness to the truth in favor of current opinion.


This excerpt from Vatican II's Dogmatic Constitution on the Church, Lumen Gentium, paragraph 25, explains the authority of the Magisterium or Apostolic teaching authority of the Church and the way in which Catholics are bound to submit to that authority.

25. Among the principal duties of bishops the preaching of the Gospel occupies an eminent place.(39*) For bishops are preachers of the faith, who lead new disciples to Christ, and they are authentic teachers, that is, teachers endowed with the authority of Christ, who preach to the people committed to them the faith they must believe and put into practice, and by the light of the Holy Spirit illustrate that faith. They bring forth from the treasury of Revelation new things and old,(164) making it bear fruit and vigilantly warding off any errors that threaten their flock.(165) Bishops, teaching in communion with the Roman Pontiff, are to be respected by all as witnesses to divine and Catholic truth. In matters of faith and morals, the bishops speak in the name of Christ and the faithful are to accept their teaching and adhere to it with a religious assent. This religious submission of mind and will must be shown in a special way to the authentic magisterium of the Roman Pontiff, even when he is not speaking ex cathedra; that is, it must be shown in such a way that his supreme magisterium is acknowledged with reverence, the judgments made by him are sincerely adhered to, according to his manifest mind and will. His mind and will in the matter may be known either from the character of the documents, from his frequent repetition of the same doctrine, or from his manner of speaking.

Although the individual bishops do not enjoy the prerogative of infallibility, they nevertheless proclaim Christ's doctrine infallibly whenever, even though dispersed through the world, but still maintaining the bond of communion among themselves and with the successor of Peter, and authentically teaching matters of faith and morals, they are in agreement on one position as definitively to be held.(40*) This is even more clearly verified when, gathered together in an ecumenical council, they are teachers and judges of faith and morals for the universal Church, whose definitions must be adhered to with the submission of faith.(41*)

And this infallibility, with which the Divine Redeemer willed His Church to be endowed in defining doctrine of faith and morals, extends as far as the deposit of Revelation extends, which must be religiously guarded and faithfully expounded. And this is the infallibility which the Roman Pontiff, the head of the college of bishops, enjoys in virtue of his office, when, as the supreme shepherd and teacher of all the faithful, who confirms his brethren in their faith,(166) by a definitive act he proclaims a doctrine of faith or morals.(42*) And therefore his definitions, of themselves, and not from the consent of the Church, are justly styled irreformable, since they are pronounced with the assistance of the Holy Spirit, promised to him in blessed Peter, and therefore they need no approval of others, nor do they allow an appeal to any other judgment. For then the Roman Pontiff is not pronouncing judgment as a private person, but as the supreme teacher of the universal Church, in whom the charism of infallibility of the Church itself is individually present, he is expounding or defending a doctrine of Catholic faith.(43*) The infallibility promised to the Church resides also in the body of Bishops, when that body exercises the supreme magisterium with the successor of Peter. To these definitions the assent of the Church can never be wanting, on account of the activity of that same Holy Spirit, by which the whole flock of Christ is preserved and progresses in unity of faith.(44*)

But when either the Roman Pontiff or the Body of Bishops together with him defines a judgment, they pronounce it in accordance with Revelation itself, which all are obliged to abide by and be in conformity with, that is, the Revelation which as written or orally handed down is transmitted in its entirety through the legitimate succession of bishops and especially in care of the Roman Pontiff himself, and which under the guiding light of the Spirit of truth is religiously preserved and faithfully expounded in the Church.(45*) The Roman Pontiff and the bishops, in view of their office and the importance of the matter, by fitting means diligently strive to inquire properly into that revelation and to give apt expression to its contents;(46*) but a new public revelation they do not accept as pertaining to the divine deposit of faith.(47*)


Homeschool

My wife and I are 99% sure we will homeschool our children. The two main reasons are 1) we want to fully provide our children their religious and moral instruction and 2) we don't want our children immersed in the peer culture with its attitudes, language, conversation subject matter, view of sexuality; its overall cynical material worldliness.

When I mention that we plan to homeschool the number one response I get from people , by far, is how will your kids learn socialization...or something of that sort. I really think they mean socializing, not socialization. Look at the definition of socialization.

SOCIALIZATION - Merriam - Webster defines socialization as, "the process by which a human being acquires the habits, beliefs, and accumulated knowledge of society through education and training for adult status."

Socialization is a different creature all together. I am not talking about having time to hang out after class and talk about your latest crush or ball game. This is about training my children to function in a given way and instilling habits and beliefs. I can hear you saying, "You can't keep your children in a bubble! They should be able to hear differing views! They should be taught how to function as part of society!" I agree. I can not keep my children in a bubble and I don't want to. I do, however, believe that it is my duty to be the primary educator for my children. They will experience things and have questions about those experiences. My wife and I will filter those experiences through our belief systems and values. We interpret the world based on our "filter". Our job as a father and mother and as teachers is to help them develop a healthy filter with a Catholic perspective. One that will rely on Catholic truth and honesty and integrity to make decisions and judgments. While I do not have any problems with them hearing views and beliefs that are different from mine, I do have a problem with them being told the views that our family holds (e.g. our beliefs about the Catholic Church, objective truth, a Creator, or sexuality) are not "politically correct", especially by teachers.

Below is transcript of Dr. Ray Guarendi's radio show called The Doctor is In. He typically begins his show with a monologue. This is a transcript of him giving details on a study on homeschooling with his usual comments.

I don't know where this number comes from, it says "Homeschooling goes BOOM! In America 74% increase in families teaching their own children since...oh since 1999. "Homeschooling movement is sweeping the nation" this is from World Net Daily; "supposed estimate one and half million children learning at home". That's about if I am recalling correctly, - the children who are in school-school age kids is around fifty five sixty million; so one and a half million is what 2 to 3%. "Dept of Education has reported that homeschooling has risen by 36% in just the last five years. National centre for educational statistics statistician Gail Mulligan told USA Today 'There is no reason to believe it would not keep going up".

Now I am not so sure whether I agree with that, because it can only go as far as the ceiling of stay at home mums. I think the number of stay at home mums, out of mums in total is 20%, 25% somewhere near. "2007 survey asked parents why they chose to homeschool. Here's the most popular reasons:

Concern about the school environment, including reasons such as safety, drugs, negative peer pressure 88%."

I am sure that many of you would speculate well the number one reason would be for moral or religious. The way the questions are phrased, negative peer pressure might come underneath that moral or religious rubric.

"The second most common reason is a desire to provide religious or moral instruction. 83%."

So there, that is for most folks right up there in their motives for homeschooling.

"A dissatisfaction with the academic instruction at other schools 73%" of the parents cited that as a reason.

"Non traditional approach to children's education or unschoolers who consider typical curriculums and standardized testing as counterproductive to quality education 65%.

Other reasons; family time, finances, travel distance 32%.

Child has special needs 21%.

Physical or mental health problem 11%.

Parents who said that they homeschooled to provide religious or moral instruction increased from 2003 to 2007."

What that basically means is that more people are homeschooling because they feel that they can provide the kind of moral religious education, not working so hard against the peer culture and the school culture. Used to be just the peer culture but unfortunately a lot of what is going on in the schools under the auspices of the schools is antithetical to the kind of moral world view that many parents want their children to have.

"Above all other responses, parents cited providing religious and moral instruction as the most important factor in the decision to teach their children at home 36% said that's the most important factor. Second most important, concern about the school environment".

I've got to believe there's overlap there. If you're concerned about the school environment, you're not necessarily just concerned about drugs or violence. Much more commonly, is "Third reason dissatisfaction with academic instruction 17%.

Research has shown the positive affects of homeschooling through the years. Brain Ray president of the National Homeschool Research Institute reveals that homeschooled children fair as well or better than private and public school students in terms of social, emotional and psychological development" - that is true. The next time somebody says to you 'What about their socialization?' you can have twenty different answers to that. But if you want to make it quick you just look and say 'Well, the research says they're better socialized.'

'WHAT?'

'Argue with the research'. And that's true, the research does say that; they say that homeschoolers are more active civically. They tend to have umm more involvement in their communities. They tend to obviously score better academically, but we're not talking about that right now. They tend to have better self images; yeah that's right even the homeschoolers have better self images. How could they do that without all those self image courses? You know they gotta have those self image courses. You homeschooling mums you better incorporate some self image courses in your curriculum. Homeschoolers earn higher marks than peers who attend public schools.

"The home educated in grades K to 12 have scored on average on the 65th to 80th percentile on standardized academic achievement tests in the US and Canada compared to the public school average of 50th percentile."

How could that be? How could these untrained mothers; these non professional educators, actually teach their children, so that they outperform their peers. It's not possible!

Apparently it is. There are three studies, which demonstrate that demographics, income and education level of homeschooling parents are generally irrelevant with regard to quality of education. On average, homeschoolers in low income families with less formal education STILL score higher than state school averages.

Yes there has been a wonderful study done where they compared mums who are certified teachers versus mums who are college graduates versus mums with some college verses mums high school graduates versus mums with not a high school graduate; Do you know what they found? NO DIFFERENCE in the kid's achievement scores. The only place where there seemed to be a little bit of a blip was in mathematics taught by non high school graduate mums. But you could understand that. How could they keep up with that level of mathematics especially at the secondary level? But other than that the component seems to be not the mother's academic level but the mother's motives, the mother's heart, the mother's commitment, the mother's sacrifice. Don't dat just beat ALL?

Relationship -who'da thought it?

"Catholic" Witness

Thank God for the outstanding and courageous leadership of Archbishop Chaput. As Catholics we all need to faithfully witness the truth of the Gospel and never be afraid to do so when challenged. Our world is certainlly in a secular/relativism chaos and the Church needs to stand tall as a pillar of truth, as well as Charity and Social Justice (in that order.) Let us all pray that God will abundantly bless those who fiercely fight for and to protect the great Gift of Life - from conception to natural death.

Catholic Apologetics


Apologetics has really revitalized my Catholic faith and life in a big way. I got introduced to Catholic apologetics many years ago[can't remember how] through the Beginning Apologetics workbook series by Jim Burnham and Frank Chacon, http://shop.catholic.com/product.php?productid=351. I was totally blown away of how what I believed on faith because I was taught growing up could be explained using logic and reason. Faith is reasonable. I've been confident and excited in living out my life as a Catholic in a way I would have never believed before being introduced to Catholic apologetics.

The word apologetics is derived from the ancient Greek word apologia. An apologia was the case a lawyer would build on behalf of his client. So apologetics is about building the case for our faith-learning how to explain and defend our faith.

I have created a set of links dedicated to Catholic apologetics. Please check them out. God bless!

The Holy Trinity


The eternal love of the Father for the Son and the eternal Love of the Son for the Father cannot be contained. From the exchange of eternal loves, springs forth the Holy Spirit.


Meat on Fridays


Most Catholics think that Vatican II did away with the requirement of not eating meat on Friday throughout the year. Most think it is now just Ash Wednesday and the Fridays of Lent that we cannot eat meat. However...

This is what the new Code of Canon Law brought out in 1983 says about the matter:

Canon 1251 : Abstinence from meat, or from some other food as determined by the Episcopal Conference, is to be observed on all Fridays, unless a solemnity should fall on a Friday. Abstinence and fasting are to be observed on Ash Wednesday and Good Friday.

Canon Law still requires that Catholics not eat meat on Fridays!

Of course, most Episcopal Conferences have determined that, instead of abstaining from meat, Catholics may perform an act of penance of their choosing. But, do you ever remember to abstain from a particular food or do some other penance on Fridays? And, at any rate, the main rule is still to abstain from meat on Fridays, the performance of another penance instead is an optional substitute.

I know a while back that the National Conference of Catholic Bishops was debating whether to repeal the determination and require all Catholics to abstain from meat on all Fridays of the year. The Bishops thought that a return to meatless Fridays for all Catholics would be of benefit, which I agree. I wonder what came of that because I haven't heard anything about it since.

Why a new blog?

I had a blog not too long ago. I thought it might be a good way to commentate on current events, politics, faith and what not. I notice in my own blog posts and even more so on other blogs that when people commentate, their commentary tends to be on what they don't like. I decided to abandon that old blog for this one in order to start anew with nothing but positive and upbeat posts. Pray for me. God bless!